<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the meta of twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moritherapy.org/article/the-meta-of-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moritherapy.org/article/the-meta-of-twitter/</link>
	<description>making lives better, making better lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.moritherapy.org/article/the-meta-of-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-664889</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moritherapy.org/?p=1432#comment-664889</guid>
		<description>Thanks for an interesting topic.

I guess the social media breaks down and reinforces social isolation.  My partner and I email each other articles and such when we are in the same room on our computers.

I suspect it changes how comfortable people will be face to face - though I think it will be a generation before we see how this works out.

The culture of social media seems approximately middle US.  It&#039;ll be interesting to see what happens as China becomes the world power.

I think twitter and other social media allow us to gossip with more/different people.  This seems to be the function increasingly of some magazines and reality TV and so on.  This seems to me to be a way of creating a shared world of meaning.  No bad thing to my mind but I do have some views about what meanings we should share.

I think the medium can affect what is communicated.  Deeper analysis and discussion won&#039;t occur in 140 space grabs.  But facebook is different for instance.

People are not (only) about information.  Perhaps we could come up with a new name for social media connections rather than &#039;friends&#039;?  How about &quot;smate&quot; = social media mate?
.-= Evan&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wellbeingandhealthnet/~3/14_1nywVc4U/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Benefits of Modesty&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for an interesting topic.</p>
<p>I guess the social media breaks down and reinforces social isolation.  My partner and I email each other articles and such when we are in the same room on our computers.</p>
<p>I suspect it changes how comfortable people will be face to face &#8211; though I think it will be a generation before we see how this works out.</p>
<p>The culture of social media seems approximately middle US.  It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens as China becomes the world power.</p>
<p>I think twitter and other social media allow us to gossip with more/different people.  This seems to be the function increasingly of some magazines and reality TV and so on.  This seems to me to be a way of creating a shared world of meaning.  No bad thing to my mind but I do have some views about what meanings we should share.</p>
<p>I think the medium can affect what is communicated.  Deeper analysis and discussion won&#8217;t occur in 140 space grabs.  But facebook is different for instance.</p>
<p>People are not (only) about information.  Perhaps we could come up with a new name for social media connections rather than &#8216;friends&#8217;?  How about &#8220;smate&#8221; = social media mate?<br />
.-= Evan&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Wellbeingandhealthnet/~3/14_1nywVc4U/" rel="nofollow">The Benefits of Modesty</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian &#124; Quantum Learning</title>
		<link>http://www.moritherapy.org/article/the-meta-of-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-664781</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian &#124; Quantum Learning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moritherapy.org/?p=1432#comment-664781</guid>
		<description>Lot&#039;s of great questions! 

My own experience is that social media brings me more contact than I would have with my extended family and friends - especially as we are geographically all over the place. It&#039;s not a substitute for face to face time but is an extension. It has also extended the circle of those I call friends - a couple of whom I&#039;ve even met face to face, which I wouldn&#039;t have done without (in this case) Twitter. 

Twitter (and IM generally) is surely changing language. One factor is the international nature of the media which develops a more universal form of English - and also develops new forms. My current favourite is &#039;my bad&#039; which I&#039;ve now heard move from IM/social media into spoken English. 

I also think our relationship to knowledge has to change. No longer are there a small number of recognised sources, but a whole range of sources. Which needs us to be more discerning about what we believe and what we don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lot&#8217;s of great questions! </p>
<p>My own experience is that social media brings me more contact than I would have with my extended family and friends &#8211; especially as we are geographically all over the place. It&#8217;s not a substitute for face to face time but is an extension. It has also extended the circle of those I call friends &#8211; a couple of whom I&#8217;ve even met face to face, which I wouldn&#8217;t have done without (in this case) Twitter. </p>
<p>Twitter (and IM generally) is surely changing language. One factor is the international nature of the media which develops a more universal form of English &#8211; and also develops new forms. My current favourite is &#8216;my bad&#8217; which I&#8217;ve now heard move from IM/social media into spoken English. </p>
<p>I also think our relationship to knowledge has to change. No longer are there a small number of recognised sources, but a whole range of sources. Which needs us to be more discerning about what we believe and what we don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

